Intrapopulation genome size variation in D. melanogaster reflects life history variation and plasticity.

TitleIntrapopulation genome size variation in D. melanogaster reflects life history variation and plasticity.
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2014
AuthorsEllis, LL, Huang, W, Quinn, AM, Ahuja, A, Alfrejd, B, Gomez, FE, Hjelmen, CE, Moore, KL, Mackay, TFC, J Johnston, S, Tarone, AM
JournalPLoS Genet
Volume10
Issue7
Paginatione1004522
Date Published2014 Jul
ISSN1553-7404
KeywordsAdaptation, Physiological, Animals, Biological Evolution, Drosophila melanogaster, Environment, Female, Genetic Variation, Genome Size, Genome, Insect, Insect Hormones
Abstract

We determined female genome sizes using flow cytometry for 211 Drosophila melanogaster sequenced inbred strains from the Drosophila Genetic Reference Panel, and found significant conspecific and intrapopulation variation in genome size. We also compared several life history traits for 25 lines with large and 25 lines with small genomes in three thermal environments, and found that genome size as well as genome size by temperature interactions significantly correlated with survival to pupation and adulthood, time to pupation, female pupal mass, and female eclosion rates. Genome size accounted for up to 23% of the variation in developmental phenotypes, but the contribution of genome size to variation in life history traits was plastic and varied according to the thermal environment. Expression data implicate differences in metabolism that correspond to genome size variation. These results indicate that significant genome size variation exists within D. melanogaster and this variation may impact the evolutionary ecology of the species. Genome size variation accounts for a significant portion of life history variation in an environmentally dependent manner, suggesting that potential fitness effects associated with genome size variation also depend on environmental conditions.

DOI10.1371/journal.pgen.1004522
Alternate JournalPLoS Genet.
PubMed ID25057905
PubMed Central IDPMC4109859

Similar Publications

Schlosser P, Zhang J, Liu H, Surapaneni AL, Rhee EP, Arking DE, et al.. Transcriptome- and proteome-wide association studies nominate determinants of kidney function and damage. Genome Biol. 2023;24(1):150.
Harris RA, McAllister JM, Strauss JF. Single-Cell RNA-Seq Identifies Pathways and Genes Contributing to the Hyperandrogenemia Associated with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24(13).
Lu J, Zheng KQ, Bertrand RElaine, Quinlan J, Ferdous S, Srinivasan T, et al.. Gene augmentation therapy to rescue degenerative photoreceptors in a Cwc27 mutant mouse model. Exp Eye Res. 2023;234:109596.
Calame DG, Guo T, Wang C, Garrett L, Jolly A, Dawood M, et al.. Monoallelic variation in DHX9, the gene encoding the DExH-box helicase DHX9, underlies neurodevelopment disorders and Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease. Am J Hum Genet. 2023;110(8):1394-1413.
Qian X, Srinivasan T, He J, Lu J, Jin Y, Gu H, et al.. Ceramide compensation by ceramide synthases preserves retinal function and structure in a retinal dystrophy mouse model. Dis Model Mech. 2023;16(7).
Sisoudiya SDushyant, Mishra P, Li H, Schraw JM, Scheurer ME, Salvi S, et al.. Identification of USP9X as a leukemia susceptibility gene. Blood Adv. 2023;7(16):4563-4575.
Yang L, Chen X, Lee C, Shi J, Lawrence EB, Zhang L, et al.. Functional characterization of age-dependent p16 epimutation reveals biological drivers and therapeutic targets for colorectal cancer. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2023;42(1):113.
Shao Y, Zhou L, Li F, Zhao L, Zhang B-L, Shao F, et al.. Phylogenomic analyses provide insights into primate evolution. Science. 2023;380(6648):913-924.
Kuderna LFK, Gao H, Janiak MC, Kuhlwilm M, Orkin JD, Bataillon T, et al.. A global catalog of whole-genome diversity from 233 primate species. Science. 2023;380(6648):906-913.
Gao H, Hamp T, Ede J, Schraiber JG, McRae J, Singer-Berk M, et al.. The landscape of tolerated genetic variation in humans and primates. Science. 2023;380(6648):eabn8153.