|Title||Prospective chromosome analysis of 3429 amniocentesis samples in China using copy number variation sequencing.|
|Publication Type||Journal Article|
|Year of Publication||2018|
|Authors||Wang, J, Chen, L, Zhou, C, Wang, L, Xie, H, Xiao, Y, Zhu, H, Hu, T, Zhang, Z, Zhu, Q, Liu, Z, Liu, S, Wang, H, Xu, M, Ren, Z, Yu, F, Cram, DS, Liu, H|
|Journal||Am J Obstet Gynecol|
|Date Published||2018 May 28|
BACKGROUND: Next generation sequencing (NGS) is emerging as a viable alternative to chromosome microarray analysis for the diagnosis of chromosome disease syndromes. One NGS methodology, copy number variation sequencing (CNV-Seq), has been shown to deliver high reliability, accuracy and reproducibility for detection of fetal CNVs in prenatal samples. However, its clinical utility as a first tier diagnostic method has yet to be demonstrated in a large cohort of pregnant women referred for fetal chromosome testing.
OBJECTIVE(S): To evaluate CNV-Seq as a first tier diagnostic method for detection of fetal chromosome anomalies in a general population of pregnant women with high-risk prenatal indications.
STUDY DESIGN: Prospective analysis of 3429 pregnant women referred for amniocentesis and fetal chromosome testing for different risk indications, including advanced maternal age (AMA), high-risk maternal serum screening (HR-MSS), and positivity for an ultrasound soft marker (USM).
METHODS: Amniocentesis was performed by standard procedures. Amniocyte DNA was analyzed by CNV-Seq with a chromosome resolution of 0.1 Mb. Fetal chromosome anomalies including whole chromosome aneuploidy and segmental imbalances were independently confirmed by gold standard cytogenetic and molecular methods and their pathogenicity determined following guidelines of the American College of Medical Genetics for sequence variants.
RESULTS: Clear interpretable CNV-Seq results were obtained for all 3429 amniocentesis samples. CNV-Seq identified 3293 (96%) samples with a normal molecular karyotype and 136 samples (4%) with an altered molecular karyotype. A total of 146 fetal chromosome anomalies were detected, comprising 46 whole chromosome aneuploidies (pathogenic), 29 submicroscopic microdeletions/microduplications with known or suspected associations with chromosome disease syndromes (pathogenic), 22 other microdeletions/microduplications (likely pathogenic) and 49 variants of uncertain significance (VUS). Overall, the cumulative frequency of pathogenic/likely pathogenic and VUS chromosome anomalies in the patient cohort was 2.83% and 1.43%, respectively. In the three high-risk AMA, HR-MSS and USM groups, the most common whole chromosome aneuploidy detected was trisomy 21, followed by sex chromosome aneuploidies, trisomy 18 and trisomy 13. Across all clinical indications, there was a similar incidence of submicroscopic CNVs, with approximately equal proportions of pathogenic/likely pathogenic and VUS CNVs. If karyotyping had been used as an alternate cytogenetics detection method, CNV-Seq would have returned a 1% higher yield of pathogenic or likely pathogenic CNVs.
CONCLUSIONS: In a large prospective clinical study, CNV-Seq delivered high reliability and accuracy for identifying clinically significant fetal anomalies in prenatal samples. Based on key performance criteria, CNV-Seq appears to be a well-suited methodology for first tier diagnosis of pregnant women in the general population at risk of having a fetal chromosome abnormality.
|Alternate Journal||Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.|